|
Leaded aviation fuel will go away; that's
the consensus among aviation and petroleum industry experts. Aircraft
engine manufacturers, aeronautical engineers, petroleum engineers, and
the FAA have been working together for years to determine how to
transition to no-lead fuel an aviation fleet that is dependent on
high-octane, leaded fuel.
The Coordinating Research Council (CRC),
a nonprofit organization that studies fuel and lubricants, formed an
Octane Rating Group in the early 1990s, when CRC first learned that
leaded fuel would eventually disappear. That group met Tuesday afternoon
at EAA AirVenture Oshkosh to review existing data and to map out a
strategy for addressing the question. It's a complex problem.
To begin with, unleaded fuel needs a
higher octane rating to achieve the same engine performance as leaded
fuel. And the higher the octane rating, the wider the performance gap
between leaded and unleaded fuels with the same octane numbers. New
engine technology that features electronic controls might narrow the
performance gap between leaded and unleaded fuels for some engines. But
it will still be a major challenge to achieve unleaded octane ratings
that will match the performance of high-octane leaded fuels in an
aircraft engine in real-world operating conditions.
The Octane Rating Group aims to determine
a "fleet" standard for unleaded fuel, one that will meet the
needs of a broad range of aircraft engines. That goal presents some
problems of its own. If you're looking for a fleet standard, which part
of the fleet do you focus on? The CRC concluded that it should focus not
on the largest number of engines but on those engines and aircraft that
represent the highest total use of fuel-in other words, engines that
operate for the highest number of hours over a given period of months or
years. Using that criterion, the Octane Rating Group will focus on
testing and seeking an octane standard for high-performance piston
engines, the kind that pull high-use business and commercial aircraft
around the sky. The group reasons that a no-lead fuel that meets the
needs of high-performance engines will also be suitable for smaller,
lower-performance engines.
The group will first have to test a
variety of engines to determine their actual octane requirements with
leaded and unleaded fuel. Then it can begin the search for a fuel
specification that would provide a fleet standard for general aviation
aircraft. Once that specification is determined, it will be up to
petroleum companies to develop the fuels that will meet or exceed that
specification.
In the end, when leaded fuel finally
disappears from fuel trucks and tanks, some aircraft will require new
engines, and some engines will have to be converted or retrofitted to
use unleaded fuels. Some engines will be derated, producing a lower
horsepower output on unleaded fuel, and some will make the transition
without problems or modifications.
EAA led the way in the use of auto fuel
in aircraft engines. We will continue to support and participate in
research into unleaded aviation fuels, and provide our members with
up-to-date information.
|